After clearing all hiccups, Imran Khan alias ‘Taliban Khan’ was sworn in as Prime Minister of nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nation of 207 million, with an economy inching towards financial disaster and perennial conflicts on its borders due to continued dependence on terrorism as the instrument of state’s policy. It is interesting to note as to why is he referred as ‘Taliban Khan’.
His sympathies towards the Taliban were made evident on several occasions in his twenty one-year old political career. In June 2002, he addressed a ‘workers convention’ in Pakistan, stating that he was inspired by the Taliban system of justice and that he would establish the same system in the country after assuming power. In 2012, after the Taliban shot 14 year old activist Malala Yousafzai in the head, Khan refused to condemn them by name. Later, in 2013 he stirred up controversy when he described a top Taliban leader, Wali ur-Rehman as ‘pro-peace’. During a 2014 Pakistani government effort to build national consensus on a statement declaring the Taliban an enemy of Pakistan and Islam, Khan called the group “our brothers” and “our people”. He is an advocate of state funding of Madrasas run by Taliban. He also supports allowing Taliban to open offices in the various cities in Pakistan. His photograph dressed as a Mujahid and sitting with Taliban cadre is very popular among the youth of Pakistan.
In 2012, when Khan pulled out of the India Today Conclave on account of it being attended by writer Salman Rushdie, he was severely criticised by the latter who compared him to Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi. “Here he is trying to placate Mullah and placate Army while presenting himself as the acceptable face of Pakistan,” said Rushdie.
Imran Khan, of course, has denied all allegations of being backed by the military. Yet, regardless of what he says the army’s influence in this year’s elections has been the main cause of his rise and fulfilment of his prime ministerial ambition. General Asif Ghafoor, the army’s spokesperson has tweeted: “You honour who You will and You humble who You will,” a verse from the Qur’an that is taken as confirmation of the military’s support for Khan. Thus, real power in deciding Pakistan’s relationships with India, Afghanistan and USA will continue to stay in the hand of generals.
Imran Khan’s love for Islam and Sharia Law is well documented. In his memoir, ‘Pakistan: A Personal History,’ Khan wrote that the biggest damage done to the Indian subcontinent was the loss of self-esteem that resulted from colonisation. “The inferiority complex that is ingrained in a conquered nation results in its imitation of some of the worst aspects of the conquerors, while at the same time neglecting its own great traditions,” according to Imran Khan. A free Pakistan, he believes, has to be rooted in the traditions of Islam.
Right in the beginning of his memoir, Khan made clear what his idea of an ideal Pakistani State should look like and what it had become. “Far from being the Islamic welfare state that was envisaged, Pakistan is a country where politics is a game of loot and plunder and any challenger to the status quo — even with my kind of public profile and popularity — can be suddenly arrested and threatened with violence,” wrote Khan in his book. In his victory speech, he began with a promise of converting Pakistan into an Islamic Welfare State, though he fell short by failing to elucidate from where he is going to garner funds for giving concrete shape to his ambition when an economic disaster is already glaring before the nation. Khan’s belief in the Sharia law to govern a state is noteworthy. He quotes complete absence of petty crimes in tribal areas of Pakistan, where Sharia is in force, to support his assertion.
In order to garner majority in the National Assembly he had to take support of dreaded Sunni militant outfits at the behest of military. This will provide the radicals and extremists the power to reshape Pakistan’s political landscape. A new but dangerous trend in the political landscape of a country that is struggling to become a democracy. He certainly will be obliged to the military and militants who would prefer a radicalised theocratic Pakistan than a democratic Pakistan.
Khan has no administrative experience. As MNA, he hardly ever attended the National Assembly. He is known more for his rhetoric and ability to organise protests rather than administrative capabilities. He is more of a demagogue. He will be ruled and guided by the powerful troika of Military-Mullah-Militants. He is talking of taking two steps forward even if India takes one. Will the troika allow him to take even a half step towards India is a million dollar question?
The pity is that many pro-Pak apologists in our country are still hoping for a better Indo-Pak relations. They are proposing a dialogue with Pakistan. This to me is mere vote-bank politics to address their core constituencies and furtherance of their appeasement policy rather than a serious discourse in national interest.
The recent infiltration attempts and spurt in terrorist activities, as well as Deep State’s open support to pro- Khalistan movement through active support to US based Sikh separatist group “Sikh for Justice” in organising Referendum 2020 in London, should act as a grim reminder of Pakistan’s intent to these Pro-Pak apologists. Pakistan’s ISI is actively using the services of dreaded global terrorist Hafiz Saeed as part of ‘Operation Express’ to once again set Punjab on fire by kindling the Khalistan movement. Social media and sleeper cells are being used extensively to provoke the youth of Punjab. Certain videos have been released with a view to create dissension among Sikh soldiers of Indian Army by asking them to not to fight for India. A large gathering of Sikhs from almost 20 countries world-wide was organised by ISI through its proxy SFJ at London’s Trafalgar Square on 12 August to raise the demand for Khalistan and set the stage for Referendum 2020.
ISI is also planning to spread the tentacle of jihadi terror to the Eastern and North-Eastern states of India and Myanmar using Bangladesh as the base and launch pad. According to inputs of National Investigation Agency (NIA), Bangladesh based terror groups Jamat ul Mujahidin Bangladesh ( JMB) and Ansar ul Bangla Team (ABT) are planning recruitments in eastern parts of India, setting up hideouts and procuring weapons for terrorist activities. These groups are also making efforts to coordinate with radical Islamic groups within India to garner their support and widen the network. The Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh are also being recruited by the ISI for terrorist activities. Bengal and Assam are being used as the testing ground since a lot of local youth in these states have already been radicalised. It is a pincer attack on India as part of the grand design of global jihad, notorious prophecy of Ghazwa-e-Hind, with Pakistan’s ISI as the main coordinator.
As far as Kashmir is concerned, Imran Khan made his intent amply clear when he termed Kashmir as the core issue and blamed Indian Army for human right excesses in Kashmir. He did not consider it appropriate to mention other outstanding disputes between the two nations. Obviously, the script of his victory speech had either been prepared or approved by the troika. The spokesman of PTI acknowledged army’s role when he said that there was nothing wrong with the Pakistan Army “advising” the government on foreign policy issues. It would be a miracle if Imran went even a few inches beyond cosmetic “posturing” as far as Kashmir is concerned.
This is the true face of ‘Atanakistan’ under the firm control of the Mullah-Military-Militant troika. Prime Ministers may come and go, their tenure is not decided by any statute book but by the Army. But when you have a PM fully obliged to the troika, one can imagine the boost terrorism will get in Pakistan. What then are India’s options? The spokesperson of India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has made India’s expectation amply clear, “India desires a prosperous and progressive Pakistan at peace with its neighbours.” The key word is “prosperous Pakistan.” A Pakistan struggling to pay debt with adverse balance of payments cannot become prosperous without reviewing its trade policy with its ‘economic giant’ neighbour India. Though during his election campaign he had accused Nawaz Sharif of “selling out to India, compromising on Pakistan’s interests for sake of his own business interests, putting his commercial relationship with a few Indian businessmen above national interest.”
But the same Imran Khan in his victory speech said, “Our economic crisis is such that we want to have good relations with all our neighbours. I think it will be very good for all of us if we have good relations with India. We need to have trade ties, and the more we will trade, both countries will benefit.” This statement is a tacit approval of the fact that Pakistan cannot revive its economy without mutual trade with India. Its over dependence on China is already showing the disastrous effect it is going to have on its sovereignty. India should accept any initiative from Imran Khan’s Pakistan for better trade relations. Better trade relations with India would also help in indirectly softening Army’s stance since a lot is at stake for the Army and its Generals as far as Pakistan’s failing economy is concerned.
Brig Anil Gupta is a Jammu based political commentator, columnist, security and strategic analyst. He can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org